Please upgrade your web browser as Internet Explorer 6 is no longer supported. Upgrade to IE8 or Install Firefox.

Caldicott & Co. Solicitors

Website designed and optimised by

mini_logo.png, 6.8kB
Traffic Law Criminal Law White Collar Crime Civil Litigation & Compensation Wills & Estate Planning Family Law
Caldicott & Co. offer expert legal traffic representation for traffic law offences, such as drink driving.
Our experienced criminal lawyers can provide the best possible legal defence for all criminal offences.
Caldicott & Co . criminal law team have experience in representing clients charged with corporate offences.
Caldicott & Co. have extensive experience in all areas of Compensation and Civil Litigation claims or matters.
If you are buying property or considering your will, Caldicott & Co. can help you with it.
Our family lawyers specialise in all aspects of family law.
Please be advised this site is currently under construction. Please check back soon.

SA LAW Hinder/Resist Police

Law Information - Public Order Offences - SA

Hinder/Resist Police

Date: 01/09/2009

The Law -

A person who hinders or resists a police officer acting in the execution of his or her duty is guilty of an   offence and liable to a maximum penalty of a fine of $2500 or imprisonment for six months [Summary Offences Act 1953 s.6].

The scope of a police officer's duty has been widely interpreted by the courts. Police officers must take all lawful steps that seem necessary to them for keeping the peace, preventing crime and protecting people or property from criminal injury or damage. This applies whether the officer is rostered for work or not. However, where the police officer's actions exceed that duty, or the officer acts illegally, a charge under this section cannot succeed. For example, a police officer who uses more force than is reasonably necessary to arrest a suspect is not acting in the execution of his or her duty.

Hinder means any obstruction or interference that makes a police officer's duty more difficult to perform. Any physical obstruction is enough, but the offence is not limited to physical obstruction. For example, a person who deliberately stands in the way of police officers or who argues with them when they are trying to arrest another person may be guilty of the offence of hindering police.

Unlike hinder, resist means actual physical resistance. Simply not doing what a member of the police force asks, or arguing about it, does not mean that a person resists. However, the physical resistance need not necessarily be an assault - for example, the action of pulling away from an officer's grasp may be enough.

Sometimes there can be no clear distinction between assaulting, hindering and resisting. These charges are often laid in situations where there is fighting and confusion and are used by the police to remove people from the area and to restore order. Hindering is often charged when a third person intervenes in an arrest of a person. Resist on the other hand, is often charged when someone resists a lawful arrest.

People who interfere or argue with the police when they are going about their duties do so at their peril. It can be difficult for members of the public to make sure that the police are acting properly and fairly without exposing themselves to the possibility of arrest.

The Maximum Penalty for Hinder/Resist Police

TBA

What the prosecution must prove - Hinder/Resist Police

TBA

TBA

Possible Defences - Hinder/Resist Police

TBA

The Court process - Hinder/Resist Police

TBA

TBA

TBA

TBA

TBA

TBA

Written by
Craig Caldicott
Criminal Defence Lawyer

Contact Craig Caldicott 

08 8298 2066